Talk:Garland trench mortar
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Garland trench mortar article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
A fact from Garland trench mortar appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 24 April 2014 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
How to lenthen range? Illogical
[edit]"Since the barrel was fixed at a 45 degree angle, the mortar was already set up to fire the grenade the maximum theoretical distance for a ballistic projectile. To extend the range the entire mortar had to be raised vertically, typically by propping it up on a box". This makes no sense. Raising the barrel above 45 degrees would shorten the range. The only way to increase range at 45 degrees would be to increase propellant charge. Rcbutcher (talk) 05:09, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia Did you know articles
- C-Class military history articles
- C-Class military science, technology, and theory articles
- Military science, technology, and theory task force articles
- C-Class weaponry articles
- Weaponry task force articles
- C-Class Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history articles
- Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force articles
- C-Class British military history articles
- British military history task force articles
- C-Class European military history articles
- European military history task force articles
- C-Class World War I articles
- World War I task force articles
- C-Class Australia articles
- Low-importance Australia articles
- Low-importance Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history articles
- WikiProject Australia articles